Katharine Viner, who adapted the activist’s journal to the stage, weighs in on the furious controversy and Corrie’s ‘powerful voice.’
Liel Leibovitz, Jewish Week
As a preview performance of the new play “My Name is Rachel Corrie” drew to an end in a downtown theater one day last week, it didn’t take long for passions to run high.
With some members of the audience still applauding the now-empty stage, others quickly engaged in political scuffles. “You,” one woman hissed at two excitable teenagers, clapping hard, “clearly didn’t understand the play,” implying that the teenagers’ enthusiasm was due to an incomplete understanding of the intricacies of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The teenagers muttered something in response.
Elsewhere in the thick line of people snaking out of the theater, debates sprung up forcefully: Was the play moving or manipulative? Was Corrie, the 23-year-old American activist killed by an Israeli bulldozer in Gaza in 2003, a martyr or a stooge?
Even before she became the subject of a play, Corrie’s legacy galvanized supporters and enraged detractors. To the former, she was a heroic figure, a fearless young woman who was not afraid to sacrifice her life for a cause she believed in, namely Palestinian rights and the end of Israeli occupation. To the latter, Corrie and the organization to which she belonged — the International Solidarity Movement — were, at best, apologists for Palestinian terrorism and, at worst, hateful zealots.